Basketball recruiting benchmarks

Field Goal Percentage by position: what each level actually looks like

Athlete Quotient's D1 field goal percentage benchmark in men's basketball is .420 for a guard, .486 for a forward and .571 for a center. The table below runs the full ladder - high school varsity to the elite D1 rung - for every position, with the women's sport-wide ladder beside it.

Field Goal Percentage benchmarks by position

Athlete Quotient men's basketball field goal percentage benchmarks (FG %).
PositionD1 eliteD1D1 floorD2D3HS varsity
Guards (PG and SG).484.420.386.360.334.308
Forwards (SF and PF).595.486.433.396.359.322
Center.677.571.526.498.470.442

Women's ladder

The women's field goal percentage ladder is published sport-wide rather than by position.

Athlete Quotient women's basketball field goal percentage benchmarks, sport-wide.
PositionD1 eliteD1D1 floorD2D3HS varsity
All positions.500.408.378.368.358.348

See where your numbers actually land

A table tells you the bar. Your AQ Score tells you where you stand against it - all five dimensions, your gaps, and the level you actually fit, scored by the same engine these benchmarks come from. Your first score is free.

Get my free AQ Score

Not sure it is worth it? See a full sample report first.

Common questions

What is a good field goal percentage for a basketball guard?

Athlete Quotient's D1 benchmark for a basketball guard is .420. The D2 rung is .360, D3 is .334 and high school varsity is .308. The elite D1 rung is .484.

What is a good field goal percentage for a basketball center?

Athlete Quotient's D1 benchmark for a basketball center is .571. The D2 rung is .498, D3 is .470 and high school varsity is .442. The elite D1 rung is .677.

How to read these

Each column is a rung on the Athlete Quotient benchmark ladder - the bar the engine scores every athlete against - not a cutoff and not an entry price. Being under a rung does not close a door. It tells you the size of the gap, which is the only number you can actually train against.

These are Athlete Quotient's own benchmarks. Where a published college figure exists we use it; where none exists, the rung is ours. We would rather say that than claim a source we do not have.

These tables are the same ones the scoring engine uses, exported from it rather than retyped, so a page can never quietly disagree with a score. More: how AQ builds benchmarks.

More basketball benchmarks